This is the logical model of the patient's score results calculated from the FINDRISC survey answers.

The date when the score result is recorded

The date of the evaluation

It is the unique identifier of the healthcare professional who encodes the information and takes responsibility for its content. The unique identifier schould be the National professional Registry Number (NISS), but in some cases, another unique identifier (NISS Bis) maybe authorized. Reference to the Practitioner for administrative information on the care provide (Reference)

The unique patient identifier. The unique identifier should be the National Patient Registry Number (NISS) but in some cases another unique identifier maybe allowed. Reference to the Patient for administrative information about the patient (Reference)

Classification of type of the observation (Observation Category) (Ref. screening tool or questionnaire)

The final result of the FINDRISC evaluation. The code will be the same regardless the evaluation scale used

Indicate the location of the patient's body where the observation is made

Specify the laterality of the body where the observation is made (ref BodySite FHIR).

The value of the final score of the FINDRISC evaluation that evaluates the risk for the patient to develop diabetes type 2. For FindRisc Evaluation, the value of the final score must be between 0 and 26. The final result is thus a number. The range depends of the scale evaluation used

Guidance on how to interpret the value by comparison to a normal/recommended range. Multiple ranges are interpreted as an 'OR', in other words, to represent two distinct target polulations, two 'referenceRange' elements would be used. Knowing what values are considered 'normal' can help evaluate the significance of a particular result. In case of FindRisc, there are 5 ranges: low=0,high=3,resultType=Very Low |low=4, high=8, resultType=Low | low=9, high=12, resultType=Moderate | low=13, high=20, resultType=High | low=21, high=26, resultType=Very High

Text based reference range in an observation

Text based reference range in an observation

The range that is evaluated from the high/low ranges

Related measurements the result score is performed from (Reference)

Text based interpretation in an observation

Text based recommendation of the practitionner

This is the logical model of the patient's score results calculated from the FINDRISC survey answers.

The date when the score result is recorded

The date of the evaluation

It is the unique identifier of the healthcare professional who encodes the information and takes responsibility for its content. The unique identifier schould be the National professional Registry Number (NISS), but in some cases, another unique identifier (NISS Bis) maybe authorized. Reference to the Practitioner for administrative information on the care provide (Reference)

The unique patient identifier. The unique identifier should be the National Patient Registry Number (NISS) but in some cases another unique identifier maybe allowed. Reference to the Patient for administrative information about the patient (Reference)

Classification of type of the observation (Observation Category) (Ref. screening tool or questionnaire)

The final result of the FINDRISC evaluation. The code will be the same regardless the evaluation scale used

Indicate the location of the patient's body where the observation is made

Specify the laterality of the body where the observation is made (ref BodySite FHIR).

The value of the final score of the FINDRISC evaluation that evaluates the risk for the patient to develop diabetes type 2. For FindRisc Evaluation, the value of the final score must be between 0 and 26. The final result is thus a number. The range depends of the scale evaluation used

Guidance on how to interpret the value by comparison to a normal/recommended range. Multiple ranges are interpreted as an 'OR', in other words, to represent two distinct target polulations, two 'referenceRange' elements would be used. Knowing what values are considered 'normal' can help evaluate the significance of a particular result. In case of FindRisc, there are 5 ranges: low=0,high=3,resultType=Very Low |low=4, high=8, resultType=Low | low=9, high=12, resultType=Moderate | low=13, high=20, resultType=High | low=21, high=26, resultType=Very High

Text based reference range in an observation

Text based reference range in an observation

The range that is evaluated from the high/low ranges

Related measurements the result score is performed from (Reference)

Text based interpretation in an observation

Text based recommendation of the practitionner

This is the logical model of the patient's score results calculated from the FINDRISC survey answers.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

• value @ url

The date when the score result is recorded

The date of the evaluation

It is the unique identifier of the healthcare professional who encodes the information and takes responsibility for its content. The unique identifier schould be the National professional Registry Number (NISS), but in some cases, another unique identifier (NISS Bis) maybe authorized. Reference to the Practitioner for administrative information on the care provide (Reference)

The unique patient identifier. The unique identifier should be the National Patient Registry Number (NISS) but in some cases another unique identifier maybe allowed. Reference to the Patient for administrative information about the patient (Reference)

Classification of type of the observation (Observation Category) (Ref. screening tool or questionnaire)

The final result of the FINDRISC evaluation. The code will be the same regardless the evaluation scale used

Indicate the location of the patient's body where the observation is made

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

• value @ url

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

Specify the laterality of the body where the observation is made (ref BodySite FHIR).

The value of the final score of the FINDRISC evaluation that evaluates the risk for the patient to develop diabetes type 2. For FindRisc Evaluation, the value of the final score must be between 0 and 26. The final result is thus a number. The range depends of the scale evaluation used

Guidance on how to interpret the value by comparison to a normal/recommended range. Multiple ranges are interpreted as an 'OR', in other words, to represent two distinct target polulations, two 'referenceRange' elements would be used. Knowing what values are considered 'normal' can help evaluate the significance of a particular result. In case of FindRisc, there are 5 ranges: low=0,high=3,resultType=Very Low |low=4, high=8, resultType=Low | low=9, high=12, resultType=Moderate | low=13, high=20, resultType=High | low=21, high=26, resultType=Very High

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

• value @ url

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Text based reference range in an observation

Text based reference range in an observation

The range that is evaluated from the high/low ranges

Related measurements the result score is performed from (Reference)

Text based interpretation in an observation

Text based recommendation of the practitionner